Careful support at the first point of contactPowered by StealthAgents
Intake pipeline reporting

Intake pipeline reporting

Show inquiry volume, waiting reasons, and follow-up ownership without obscuring attorney decisions.

Book a free consultation

Scope, access, and coverage are agreed with your team.

Woman lawyer reviewing papers at office desk, focused and professional.
Practical support. Defined responsibilities.
The day-to-day work

A clear queue. A useful handoff.

Define the recurring work and the evidence your team needs to review it. These building blocks become a role-specific operating plan.

  • Compile approved intake stages
  • Identify unassigned inquiries
  • Track administrative waiting reasons
  • Prepare dated manager summaries
What comes back to your team

Work you can see and review.

Pipeline report

A working record with source references, current status, and the person responsible for the next step.

Unassigned inquiry list

A focused view of missing inputs, unanswered questions, and items that need your decision.

Follow-up summary

A dated handoff that distinguishes completed work from pending review and unresolved exceptions.

Put the role into practice

From the first brief to the final check.

Prepare

Give the role a reliable starting point.

Agree stage definitions, reporting cutoff, privacy controls, and the report’s intended audience.

An example working day

A practical handoff

Several inquiries are awaiting documents while others await attorney review. The assistant separates those queues so the manager can assign the right next step.

Illustrative workflow, not a client case study.
Review

Check the work before closing the loop.

Reconcile counts to source records. Do not equate consultations with retained clients.

Your systems, your permissions

Fit the role to your environment.

Tool familiarity is considered when defining the role. Your team approves every platform, access level, and source of truth.

ExcelLawmaticsClio GrowPower BI

Platform names describe possible working environments, not endorsements or a promise of certification.

Inside the responsibility

What intake pipeline reporting looks like in practice.

Show inquiry volume, waiting reasons, and follow-up ownership without obscuring attorney decisions. The scope below connects each recurring responsibility to its source information and a checkable working record. Your team confirms the exact steps, templates, and approval limits before work starts.

Compile approved intake stages

Begin with the latest request and its approved source record. Check that the necessary information is present, identify the owner, and clarify conflicting details before making an update.

Working output: Pipeline report. Include the source reference, current status, and next owner when an item remains open.

Identify unassigned inquiries

Use the agreed template or checklist to carry out this task. Record what was checked and the date of the action so another team member can understand the current position.

Working output: Unassigned inquiry list. Include the source reference, current status, and next owner when an item remains open.

Track administrative waiting reasons

Keep this work connected to the wider queue. Note dependencies and unanswered questions, and use the agreed escalation route when the next step requires a decision.

Working output: Follow-up summary. Include the source reference, current status, and next owner when an item remains open.

Prepare dated manager summaries

Complete the task only when its agreed checks have passed. If an input is missing or an approval is pending, keep that status visible rather than treating the item as finished.

Working output: Pipeline report. Include the source reference, current status, and next owner when an item remains open.

A handoff you can act on

Keep ready work separate from unresolved work.

Several inquiries are awaiting documents while others await attorney review. The assistant separates those queues so the manager can assign the right next step.

Ready for review

The agreed task is complete and the supporting information is available in your approved system. Attach or link the relevant record and identify any final reviewer before closing the item.

Review against: Reconcile counts to source records. Do not equate consultations with retained clients.

Waiting on an input

Name the missing information, where it was requested, and who is expected to supply it. Keep a follow-up date visible. An unanswered request should not disappear into a completed-work total.

Starting requirements: Agree stage definitions, reporting cutoff, privacy controls, and the report’s intended audience.

Needs your decision

Summarize the exception and the information already checked. Ask a specific question and route it to the authorized person. Keep the original source intact while the decision is pending.

Approval boundary: Firm leaders decide acceptance criteria, staffing, and legal service strategy.

Set the role up well

Agree what good work means before the first handoff.

Access and examples

Provide individual, approved access to the systems used for this responsibility. Share a completed example, an incomplete example, the relevant template, and a named reviewer. Sensitive working records belong in those systems, not in a public inquiry form.

Possible working environments include Excel, Lawmatics, Clio Grow, Power BI. Tool access and familiarity are confirmed as part of the role brief.

Review and workload measures

Agree which measures are useful for this queue: completed items, items awaiting an input, age of unresolved work, and corrections requested by the reviewer. Review these together with actual examples; volume alone does not establish that work is accurate.

Set response expectations from your operating needs. Coverage, turnaround targets, and the amount of work assigned are agreed separately rather than assumed from the service name.

Before you start

A few useful questions.

What should we prepare for intake pipeline reporting?

Agree stage definitions, reporting cutoff, privacy controls, and the report’s intended audience.

How will we know what is complete?

Reconcile counts to source records. Do not equate consultations with retained clients.

Which decisions remain with us?

Firm leaders decide acceptance criteria, staffing, and legal service strategy.

Can the role work in our existing tools?

We scope the role around your approved systems, including environments such as Excel, Lawmatics, Clio Grow. Access, training, and the final tool requirements are confirmed before the role begins.

A role shaped around your operation

Start with the work
you want to hand over.

Tell us where the queue slows down. We’ll discuss the scope, tools, coverage, and review points that belong in your support role.

Book a free consultation

Define the role before making a commitment.