The input
Your approved systems, requests, documents, and priority rules. A named contact resolves missing information.
Administrative intake support for law firms, connecting initial inquiries, consultation scheduling, document requests, and attorney-owned decisions. Find the responsibilities, working outputs, and review points for each role below.
Book a free consultationBrowse all services ↓
Explore a focused workflow or combine related tasks into one clearly defined support role. Every service includes practical responsibilities and a useful handoff.

Capture approved first-contact information and route it to the correct person in your firm.
Explore this service
Arrange consultations using approved availability, prerequisites, and client communication.
Explore this service
Maintain respectful, approved follow-up while an inquiry awaits information or attorney review.
Explore this service
Coordinate attorney-approved document requests through the firm’s secure channels.
Explore this service
Prepare names and administrative identifiers for your firm’s attorney-controlled conflict process.
Explore this service
Keep inquiries, communications, and next actions connected in the firm’s approved system.
Explore this service
Prepare concise administrative summaries that help attorneys see the original inquiry and unanswered questions.
Explore this service
Show inquiry volume, waiting reasons, and follow-up ownership without obscuring attorney decisions.
Explore this serviceA new inquiry can contain an urgent deadline, a potential conflict, or more sensitive information than the firm needs at first contact. A deliberate intake process helps staff collect the right details and route them promptly.
Your approved systems, requests, documents, and priority rules. A named contact resolves missing information.
Current status, responsible owner, last action, and outstanding questions. Each entry links back to its source.
Completed tasks and exceptions, separated clearly. Your reviewer sees what is ready and what still needs a decision.
A useful service starts with a real queue. Use these examples to choose the responsibility you want covered and the result your reviewer should receive. Related responsibilities can be combined after checking volume, coverage, and access.
Capture approved first-contact information and route it to the correct person in your firm.
Inquiry record; Urgent-review handoff; Missing-information queue.
Review exact names, contact details, source wording, and handoff acknowledgment.
Arrange consultations using approved availability, prerequisites, and client communication.
Consultation calendar; Confirmation record; Rescheduling queue.
Check attorney, meeting format, time zone, and prerequisite completion.
Maintain respectful, approved follow-up while an inquiry awaits information or attorney review.
Follow-up queue; Response history; Attorney question list.
Check consent preferences, contact accuracy, and the current inquiry status before sending.
Coordinate attorney-approved document requests through the firm’s secure channels.
Document request tracker; Receipt index; Review-ready pack.
Match documents to the correct inquiry and preserve original filenames or source metadata.
Prepare names and administrative identifiers for your firm’s attorney-controlled conflict process.
Party-name worksheet; Source notes; Reviewer handoff.
Check exact spelling and source attribution. Do not treat a missing system match as clearance.
Keep inquiries, communications, and next actions connected in the firm’s approved system.
Current inquiry records; Duplicate review queue; Ownership report.
Check matter association, access restrictions, and whether the recorded stage matches the actual decision.
Prepare concise administrative summaries that help attorneys see the original inquiry and unanswered questions.
Review brief; Source index; Instruction log.
Check names, chronology, links, and the distinction between reported facts and conclusions.
Show inquiry volume, waiting reasons, and follow-up ownership without obscuring attorney decisions.
Pipeline report; Unassigned inquiry list; Follow-up summary.
Reconcile counts to source records. Do not equate consultations with retained clients.
A new inquiry can contain an urgent deadline, a potential conflict, or more sensitive information than the firm needs at first contact. A deliberate intake process helps staff collect the right details and route them promptly.
Choose recent examples from your normal workload, including one incomplete request and one that needed a decision. Note how often each task arrives, how long it usually takes, and whether the work clusters around particular days or deadlines.
Provide intake scripts, practice categories, emergency routing, and limits on detail collected before review.
Agree what the assistant can complete using a documented rule and what must come back to your team. A clear escalation route helps avoid repeated interruptions while keeping unusual requests visible.
No legal advice, case assessment, deadline calculation, or representation promise.
Document working hours, time zones, priority categories, and who covers the queue outside the agreed schedule. Distinguish an acknowledgment from a completed task so a quick reply is never mistaken for a finished request.
For law firm, the plan should also name who can change priorities when a time-sensitive item arrives.
Begin with a manageable portion of the queue. Your reviewer checks completed work against source records and gives specific feedback. Expand responsibilities only when the examples show the process is understood and the access and training requirements are in place.
Bring your current tools to the consultation: Clio Grow, Lawmatics, MyCase, Approved phone platform, Outlook, Google Calendar. Final requirements are confirmed together.
Agree a reporting format before the role begins. The aim is to make the queue easier to manage, not to create another report your team has to decipher.
Review new requests, approaching deadlines, and items returned for correction. Check the latest instructions and identify anything missing before taking the next action.
Update the approved record as work changes. Keep source references and the next owner together. Escalations should include the question, the evidence already checked, and the decision needed.
Separate completed items from work awaiting information or approval. Include the next action and responsible person for each open item so the next shift or reviewer can continue without reconstructing the history.
Not necessarily. Related tasks can form one role when the workload, hours, systems, and experience requirements fit together. We’ll discuss the practical combination during your consultation.
Begin with a documented scope and review actual workload. Additional responsibilities should be agreed with clear training, access, and review requirements.
Pick work that repeats, has a clear owner, and can be checked against an example. Bring the volume, deadlines, and common exceptions to the conversation.
Your authorized staff keep professional judgment, policy decisions, financial authority, and final approvals. Each service page describes the relevant boundaries.
Tell us where the queue slows down. We’ll discuss the scope, tools, coverage, and review points that belong in your support role.
Define the role before making a commitment.